- Home
- Medical news & Guidelines
- Anesthesiology
- Cardiology and CTVS
- Critical Care
- Dentistry
- Dermatology
- Diabetes and Endocrinology
- ENT
- Gastroenterology
- Medicine
- Nephrology
- Neurology
- Obstretics-Gynaecology
- Oncology
- Ophthalmology
- Orthopaedics
- Pediatrics-Neonatology
- Psychiatry
- Pulmonology
- Radiology
- Surgery
- Urology
- Laboratory Medicine
- Diet
- Nursing
- Paramedical
- Physiotherapy
- Health news
- Fact Check
- Bone Health Fact Check
- Brain Health Fact Check
- Cancer Related Fact Check
- Child Care Fact Check
- Dental and oral health fact check
- Diabetes and metabolic health fact check
- Diet and Nutrition Fact Check
- Eye and ENT Care Fact Check
- Fitness fact check
- Gut health fact check
- Heart health fact check
- Kidney health fact check
- Medical education fact check
- Men's health fact check
- Respiratory fact check
- Skin and hair care fact check
- Vaccine and Immunization fact check
- Women's health fact check
- AYUSH
- State News
- Andaman and Nicobar Islands
- Andhra Pradesh
- Arunachal Pradesh
- Assam
- Bihar
- Chandigarh
- Chattisgarh
- Dadra and Nagar Haveli
- Daman and Diu
- Delhi
- Goa
- Gujarat
- Haryana
- Himachal Pradesh
- Jammu & Kashmir
- Jharkhand
- Karnataka
- Kerala
- Ladakh
- Lakshadweep
- Madhya Pradesh
- Maharashtra
- Manipur
- Meghalaya
- Mizoram
- Nagaland
- Odisha
- Puducherry
- Punjab
- Rajasthan
- Sikkim
- Tamil Nadu
- Telangana
- Tripura
- Uttar Pradesh
- Uttrakhand
- West Bengal
- Medical Education
- Industry
Minor denied treatment at 2 Govt Hospitals; Delhi HC directs Rs 12,000 reimbursement

New Delhi: Observing that denial of timely medical treatment by government hospitals amounts to a violation of the right to life under Article 21 of the Constitution, the Delhi High Court has directed the government to reimburse medical expenses of Rs 12,000 to a minor who was denied treatment at two government hospitals.
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, while passing the order, directed the government to make the payment within two months. The Court also granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue a separate civil suit for compensation.
According to an ANI report, the case arose after the petitioner, a minor student, suffered a fracture in his left arm while playing at a government school. He was first taken to Dr. Hedgewar Aarogya Sansthan, where treatment could not be provided due to the non-availability of basic medical supplies. He was then taken to Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalaya, but was allegedly denied treatment as no doctor was available at the time.
Due to the refusal of treatment at both government hospitals, the petitioner had to seek care at a private hospital, incurring expenses of around Rs 14,000.
Notably, the respondents admitted that the petitioner had visited both hospitals and that treatment was not provided. The Court observed that this failure remained undisputed.
Relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity vs State of West Bengal, the High Court reiterated that providing timely medical treatment is an essential obligation of the State under Article 21 of the Constitution. Any denial of such treatment amounts to a violation of the right to life, reports ANI.
In view of these principles and the admitted facts, the Court held that reimbursement of medical expenses was justified. However, it clarified that claims for additional compensation would require adjudication through a civil suit, especially where disputed questions of fact arise.
Kajal Rajput joined Medical Dialogues as an Correspondent for the Latest Health News Section in 2019. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Arts from University of Delhi. She manly covers all the updates in health news, hospitals, doctors news, government policies and Health Ministry. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in Contact no. 011-43720751

